July '07
Page 9
 

 



613.337.8662


I will fulfill your every catering need; finest quality food, home cooked of course!  free consultation, menu and event planning.

WHATEVER THE OCCASION, WHATEVER THE FOOD, COUNT ON US TO PUT YOU IN THE MOOD.   

Carole - 656-4954
Chris - 656-1669
Debbie - 656-4888


 

Identifying the four thrush species that nest here – Hermit, Wood, Swainson Thrushes and Veery - to me, is all about the various combinations of two colours – rust and olive. We will know the bird is a thrush because, although slightly smaller, it resembles its Robin-relative in shape, and like a Robin, feeds on grubs, caterpillars and insects on the ground – thrushes are seen in the woods and Robins more in the open. They all eat berries, mostly in the Fall and Winter. The adults of these four species have spots on their breast, from the many, round, dark spots of the Wood Thrush to the Veery with faint spotting on only the upper breast. They are darker above and lighter below to blend in with their surroundings. It is the dark upper with different combinations of rust and olive that distinguishes the various species: The Hermit is olive with a rusty tail; the Wood is olive with a rusty head; the Swainson is all olive and the Veery is all rusty. Next time you are walking in the woods, challenge yourself to identify these thrushes and listen for their lovely, flute-like songs, especially at dusk.

 

 

On the Watch
June Hitchcox
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

RETURN TO TOP

 

Crowe Valley Conservation Authority clarification...

In response to a recent article in the “Apsley Voice”, I would like to offer the following for the purposes of clarity to ensure residents residing within the Crowe Valley watershed boundaries receive information that would be pertinent and essential, should future shoreline activities be considered in the future.

Before I begin my commentary, I would like to state that the dissemination of information outlining the programs and services offered by the Crowe Valley Conservation Authority to the public will be an ongoing process for our watershed residents. Regrettably, even with all of the communication tools at our disposal, the ripple effect still has to take its course and even then, there will be those who may be missed. It just seems to be a fact of life.

Indeed, as per the article, “New Permits Required for Chandos by the Crowe Valley Conservation Authority”, the CVCA now administers Ontario Regulation 159/06 the Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses Regulation. There is a regulated area which surrounds all wetlands and waterbodies within the Crowe Valley watershed. The watershed is comprised of portions of 10 municipal partners within the CVCA. North Kawartha, being one of those partners, has a substantial portion of the municipality located within the CVCA’s boundaries. This means Chandos Lake and all wetlands and waterbodies within those boundaries are subject to the aforementioned regulation.

As per the provincial government’s initiative to reduce red tape, steps were taken to bring clarity and consistency across the province, which for Conservation Authorities, began with the review of the Conservation Authorities Act in 1999. This eventually led to an amendment to the existing regulations. The Ministry of Natural Resources, in conjunction with Conservation Ontario created a Peer Review Committee for the purposes of developing generic regulations for all Conservation Authorities across the province. Since that initiative, the Crowe Valley Conservation Authority has followed a process outlined by the Ministry of Natural Resources to ensure CVCA’s submission conformed to provincial standards. Briefly, in order to inform the public, the Authority has had public information sessions, completed a mailout to approximately 100 key contacts in the public domain and advertised in local newspapers. In addition, several key discussions have been held at the Conservation Authority board with the appropriate and necessary motions to comply with the submission. Once this process was completed in its entirety, Ontario Regulation 159/06 was approved by Minister Ramsay on 28 April 2006.

Since that time, the CVCA board has made preparations to administer the regulations, including the approval of policies and procedures by the Authority board at the annual meeting in February and providing information sessions for our member municipalities in the spring of 2007. The process has been extensive with the CVCA meeting or exceeding provincial requirements along the way.

The author of the Apsley Voice article is correct that an application will need to be submitted to the Authority for approval for a permit. This process is not unique to this Authority. In fact, of the 36 Conservation Authorities across the province, the CVCA was the last Authority to adopt and implement the regulations.

This office is making every effort possible, given the resources available to the CVCA to ensure a reasonable turnaround time of approximately 10 days to two weeks. Staff are cognizant that residents wish to proceed with their projects, additions etc. as quickly as possible and lengthy delays are to be avoided.

As well, at this particular point, I would like to note that the Authority does not charge for a septic system. However, should a septic system require alterations in the regulated zone, such as additional fill, then an application would be needed.

I would like to inform the public that the regulations are not so restrictive as to not allow any development. The intent of the regulations is to ensure that proper development occurs. A good example would be an addition on a cottage. The cottage may be located in the regulated zone (and hence potentially the floodplain), but the addition would be subject to flood proofing standards. So, proper development occurs and the threat of damage from flooding is minimized or eliminated for the new construction. Of course, every situation is unique and reviewed on its own merits. Fortunately, the CVCA has a trained regulations officer who reviews the application and issues the permits.

Why is there such concern for new development? The first is that new construction is not being placed in harm’s way and people who would be using the structures would not be exposed to potential dangers or loss of life from flooding issues. So, that is a good thing to prevent future development being exposed to damage and/or destruction and protecting people. It’s a preventative approach that complements the CVCA’s other programs and services.

The second goal/benefit is that the hydrological function of Chandos Lake (or other waterbodies) is being preserved as well as possible at this point in time. In essence, the flood storage capacity of the lake is not being altered (which it would be should the floodplain be allowed to be filled) and the preservation of wetland areas are maintained.

Not only do the regulations help to prevent problems for people and their personal property, but it will help to preserve the lake as it is today, which are the reasons why you come back to the cottage or take up permanent residence on the lake.

I understand that the regulations are new and there will be an adjustment period, but for the sake of, for example Chandos Lake, it really will be worth it now and into the future to protect people, the environment and development as those cottages and residences are passed onto future generations.

 

Tim Pidduck

General Manager/ Secretary-Treasurer Crowe Valley Conservation Authority

 

RETURN TO TOP

Select Feature

  Thrushes, Crowe Valley.